Immigration, Spatial Assimilation, and Segmented Paths within the Metropolis
Abstract
The settlement of recent immigrants in suburban locations at the time of their arrival challenges the assumptions of the spatial assimilation model. Using Public Use Microdata from the 1990 census and carefully defined immigrant cohorts, this paper investigates the settlement location of recent (1965-74 and 1975-84) immigrant cohorts through the lens of an extended segmented assimilation framework. Analysis is completed at two spatial scales, including central city versus outlying areas choice within the New York CMSA and at a broader, national scale where settlement outside of traditional immigrant gateways offers additional insight. Results suggest that the segmented assimilation framework better describes the emergent settlement pattern than the spatial assimilation theory, with the conclusion arguing that space must be better represented within the framework when accounting for observed differences in assimilation.References
Alba, R.D., Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J., Marzan, G. and Zhang, W. (1999) Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of sub urbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64:446-460.
Alba, R.D., Logan, J.R. and Stults, B. J. (2000) The changing neighborhood contexts of the immigrant metropolis. Social Forces, 79:587-621.
Alba, R.D. and Logan, J.R. (1991) Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28:431-53.
Allen, J.e and Turner, E. (1996) Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation. The Professional Geographer, 48: 140-55.
Bean, ED. and Tienda, M. (1987) The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Brubaker, R. (2001) The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24:531-548.
Burgess, E.W (1925) The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W and McKenzie, R.D. (eds.) The City. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 47-62.
Clark, WA.Y. (1998) The California Cauldron: Immigration and the Fortunes of Local Communities. New York: Guilford.
Dunlevy, J.A. (1980) Nineteenth-century European immigration to the United States: Intended versus lifetime settlement patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29:77-90.
Ellis, M. and Wright, R. (1998a) The Balkanization metaphor in the analysis of US immigration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88: 686-698.
Ellis, M. and Wright, R. (1998b) When immigrants are not migrations: Counting arrivals of the foreignborn using the US Census. International Migration Review, 32: 127-144.
Frey, W (1996) Immigration, domestic migration, and demographic balkanization in America: New evidence for the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 22:741-763.
Frey, Wand Speare, A. (1988) Regional and Metropolitan Growth and Decline in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Funkhouser, E. (2000) Changes in the geographic concentration and location of residences of immigrants. International Migration Review, 34:489-510.
Gans, H. (1967) The Levittowners: Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gimple, J.G. (1999) Separate Destinations: Migration, Immigration, and the Politics of Places. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Gordon, M. (1964) Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gorrie, e (1991) Farewell to Chinatown. Canadian Geographic, 111: 1-28.
Greene, R.e (1997) Chicago's new immigrants, indigenous poor and edge cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 551: 178-90.
Howenstine, E. (1996) Ethnic change and segregation in Chicago. In Roseman, C.C., Laux, H.D. and Thieme, G. (cds.) EthniCity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 31-50.
Lieberson, S. (1962) Suburbs and ethnic residential patterns. American Journal of Sociology, 67:673-681.
Lieberson, S. and Waters, M.E. (1987) The location of ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Sociological Forum, 2:780-810.
Mahler, S. (1995) American Dreaming: Immigrant Life on the Margins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Massey, D.S. (1985) Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69:315-50.
Massey, D.S. and Denton, N. (1987) Trends in residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970-1980. American Sociological Review, 52:802-25.
Massey, D.S. and Denton, N. (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McHugh, K.E., Miyares, LN. and Skop, E.H. (1997) The magnetism of Miami: Segmented paths in Cuban migration. The Geographical Review, 87:504-519.
Moore, J. and Pinderhughes, R. (1993) Introduction. In Moore, J. and Pinderhughes, R (eds.) In the Barrios: Latinos and the Underclass Debate. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. xi-xxxix
Myers, D. and Lee, S.W (1996) Immigration cohorts and residential overcrowding in Southern California. Demography, 33:51-65.
Newbold, K.B. (1999) Spatial distribution and redistribution of immigrants in the metropolitan US: 1980 and 1990. Economic Geography, 75 :254-71.
Newbold, K.B. (2001) Measuring migration among the foreign-born: Insights from Canadian data. Review of Regional Studies, 31: 177-95.
Newbold, K.B. and Spindler, J. (2001) Immigrant settlement in metropolitan Chicago. Urban Studies, 38:1903-1919.
Pandit, K. and Davies-Withers, S. (1999) Migration and Restructuring in the US: A Geographical Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Park, R.E. (1928) Race and Culture. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Park, S. (1994) Sub urbanization of Korean Immigrants in Chicago. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
Portes, A. (1994) Introduction: Immigration and its aftermath. International Migration Review, 28:632-39.
Portes, A. (1996) Economic sociology and the sociology of immigration: A conceptual overview. In Portes, A. (ed.) The Economic Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 1-41.
Portes, A. and Borocz, J. (1989) Contemporary immigration: Theoretical perspectives on its determinants and its modes of incorporation. International Migration Review, 23:606-630.
Portes, A. and Rumbaut, R. (1996) Immigrant America: A Portrait (Second Edition). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Portes, A. and Zhou, M. (1993) Should immigrants assimilate? The Public Interest, 116:18-33.
Rumbaut, R. (1994). The crucible within: Ethnic identity, self-esteem, and segmented assimilation among children of immigrants. International Migration Review, 28:748-794.
Skop, E. (2001) Race and Place in the Adaptation of Mariel Exiles. International Migration Review, 35:449-471.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992) Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Public Use Microdata Sample: 5 Percent Sample (Computer file). 2nd release. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
Walker, R. and Hannan, M. (1989) Dynamic settlement processes: The case of US immigration. The Professional Geographer, 41: 172-83.
White, M. J., Biddlecom, A.E. and Guo, S. (1993) Immigration, naturalization, and residential assimilation among Asian Americans in 1980. Social Forces, 72: 93-117.
Wright, R. and Ellis, M. (2000) Race, region and the territorial politics of immigration in the US. International Journal of Population Geography, 6: 197-211.
Zelinsky, Wand Lee, B.A. (1998) Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the sociospatial behavior of immigrant communities. International Journal of Population Geography, 4:281-98.
- The contributor(s) (authors) warrant that the entire work is original and unpublished; it is submitted only to this Journal and all text, data, figures/tables or other illustrations included in this work are completely original and unpublished, and these have not been previously published or submitted elsewhere in any form or media whatsoever.
- The contributor(s) warrant that the work contains no unlawful or libelous statements and opinions and liable materials of any kind whatsoever, does not infringe on any copyrights, intellectual property rights, personal rights or rights of any kind of others, nor contains any plagiarized, fraudulent, improperly attributed materials, instructions, procedures, information or ideas that might cause any harm, damage, injury, losses or costs of any kind to person or property.
- The contributor(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Geography Research Forum may disseminate the content of the publications and publications’ Meta data in text, image, or other print and electronic formats to providers of research databases (e.g. EBSCO, GeoBase, JSTOR) to facilitate publications' exposure.
