Can Planning Protect the Public Interest? The Challenge of Coastal Planning in Israel
Abstract
This paper challenges the capacity of the planning system to protect the public interest and to safeguard it for the sake of the common and future generations. The question underlying the discussion is this: once the public interest is defined and accepted, once it is backed by planning policies and plans – can the planning system still deliver its goal and really protect it? We examine this issue by looking at the performance of the Israeli planning system at the coastal arena. More specifically, we compare between three modes of planning and management that operated in Israel in connection with the coasts: the first is the statutory comprehensive plan represented by the National Outline Plan no. 13, authorized in 1983; the second is the strategic planning represented by the Coastal Waters Policy Paper, accepted 1999 and; the thirds is the primary legislation represented by the Coastal Conservation Law authorized in 2004. The paper exposes the operation of these planning tools and assesses their utility in terms of protecting the public interest at the coast. The limited capacity of the planning system to protect the public interest is thus discussed as well as the ways it could be improved.References
Alfasi, N. (2006) Planning policy? Between long-term planning and zoning amendments in the Israeli planning system. Environment and Planning A, 38 (3):553-568.
Allmendinger, P., Barker, A., Stead, S. (2002) Delivering integrated coastal-zone management through land-use planning. Planning Practice and Research, 17 (2): 175–196.
Booth. P. (1995) Planning or discretionary action: Certainty and responsiveness in implementing planning policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14 (2): 103-112.
Booth. P. (1996) Controlling Development: Certainty and Discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong. London: UCL Press, The Natural and Built Environment Series 9.
Booth, P., Breuillard, M., Fraser, C., and Paris, D. (2007) Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France. London: Routledge.
Bresler, G. (2008) Personal interview (Representative to the Coastal Conservation Commission, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Israel).
Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., Karlsen, G. R., Maurstad, A., and Søreng, S. (2004) In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean and Coastal Management, 47: 207–223.
Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (2000) Moral obligations, planning and the public interest: A commentary on current British practice. Environment and Planning B, 27: 297–312.
Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory, 1(2): 163-187.
Claydon, J. and Smith, B. (1997) Negotiating planning gains through the British development control system. Urban Studies, 34 (12): 2003-2022.
Cullingworth, J. B. (1993) The Political Culture of Planning: American Land-Use Planning in a Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Cullingworth, J. B. (1994) Alternate planning systems: Is there anything to learn from abroad? Journal of the American Planning Association, 60 (2): 162-172.
Fletcher, S. (2000) The evolution of coastal management policy in the state of Israel. Marine Policy, 24: 395-405.
Forester, J. (1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: New York Press.
Han, I. (1999) Landings on Israel’s Mediterranean coasts, Tel Aviv: The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel (Hebrew).
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Howe, E. (1992) Professional roles and the public interest in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 6(3): 230–48.
Huggett, D. (1998) The role of federal government intervention in coastal zone planning and management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 39: 33-50.
Hull, A. (1998) Spatial planning - The development plan as a vehicle to unlock development potential. Cities 15 (5): 327-335.
Israel Planning Authority (IPA) (1983) National Outline Plan no. 13: A National Plan for Israel’s Mediterranean Coast. Jerusalem: The Ministry of Interiors. (Hebrew)
Kay, R. and Alder, J. (2005) Coastal Planning and Management. London: Taylor and Francis.
Klosterman, R. (1980) A public interest criterion. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43(3): 323–33.
Lerman, E. (2008) Personal interview (Representative to the Coastal Conservation Commission, The public interest).
Newman, P. Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects. London: Routledge.
Olsen, S. B. (2003) Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46: 347–361.
Papay, N. (2008) Personal communication (Representative to the Coastal Conservation Commission, Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel).
Taussik, J. (1997) The influence of institutional systems on planning the coastal zone: Experience from England/Wales and Sweden. Planning Practice and Research, 12 (1): 9-19.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. (1999) Discretion, flexibility, and certainty in British planning: Emerging ideological conflicts and inherent political tensions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(3): 244-256
Treby, E. J. and Clark, M. J. (2004) Refining a practical approach to participatory decision making: An example from coastal zone management. Coastal Management, 32 (4): 353-37
- The contributor(s) (authors) warrant that the entire work is original and unpublished; it is submitted only to this Journal and all text, data, figures/tables or other illustrations included in this work are completely original and unpublished, and these have not been previously published or submitted elsewhere in any form or media whatsoever.
- The contributor(s) warrant that the work contains no unlawful or libelous statements and opinions and liable materials of any kind whatsoever, does not infringe on any copyrights, intellectual property rights, personal rights or rights of any kind of others, nor contains any plagiarized, fraudulent, improperly attributed materials, instructions, procedures, information or ideas that might cause any harm, damage, injury, losses or costs of any kind to person or property.
- The contributor(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Geography Research Forum may disseminate the content of the publications and publications’ Meta data in text, image, or other print and electronic formats to providers of research databases (e.g. EBSCO, GeoBase, JSTOR) to facilitate publications' exposure.
